Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Thom Hartmann: Big tobacco is suing the FDA because they say - they're people!

Thom plus logo

Big tobacco is suing the FDA. Under new FDA regulations - by September of next year all cigarette packs must display graphic images showing the consequences of smoking. But now - the tobacco companies are pushing back - using the Mitt Romney argument that they're people - and that these new regulations violate their First Amendment rights.

Lorillard - the nation's third largest cigarette maker - said the new regulations were, "an unconstitutional way of forcing tobacco manufacturers to disseminate the government's anti-smoking message." The government SHOULD have an anti-smoking message.

Smoking kills more than 1,200 people a day - is the only product legally sold in America that kills people when it's used as directed, and costs taxpayers a fortune in healthcare and lost productivity.

-Thom

(What do you think? Tell us here.)

Norman Goldman: This Week in Tweets

Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman
Norman Goldman

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Randi Rhodes: Tex-Ass

HOUR TWO GUEST: Jim Hightower will separate Rick Perry fact from fiction.

That didn’t take long. If you were wondering how long it would take for Rick Perry to cross the line, it looks like he’s starting out from across the line. When asked if he was suggesting that President Obama does not love America, Perry said “You need to ask him.” Congratulations, Rick. You’ve been in this race something like 48 hours and you’ve already broken Sarah Palin’s “pals around with terrorists” record for incivility.

Rick Perry isn’t just attacking President Obama. Yesterday Perry warned Federal Reserve Chairman Bill Bernanke against “printing more money.” And since in Rick Perry’s world, no warning is considered serious unless it’s accompanied by a threat, he threw one in. Perry said that if Bernanke “prints more money between now and the election, I don’t know what y’all would do to him in Iowa, but we would treat him pretty ugly down in Texas.” What kind of thing is that to say? I’d be very angry if I were Ben Bernanke. And I’d be infuriated if I were from Texas. Then Perry said that printing more money is “almost treasonous in my opinion.” Wow. Perry is a guy who has openly advocated secession. I didn’t know if ANYTHING could be treasonous in his opinion. Ever notice that people with a southern accent often intentionally make their southern drawl more extreme when they want to intimidate people? They know we’ve all seen the movie “Deliverance.”

When Rick Perry was asked if he wasn’t a little bit too much like George Bush, he said “one of the quick you can tell the difference is that he’s a Yale graduate; I’m a Texas A&M graduate.” Got that? The only problem with George Bush was that golldarned Ivy League education. I never thought that the fact that George Bush went to Yale University said anything bad about George Bush. It said plenty of bad things about Yale University.

As far as Rick Perry’s “Texas Miracle” goes, it seems like Texas ranks last or next to last in every ranking for things you don’t want to be last in. The only reason Texas is not dead last in everything is the existence of the state of Mississippi. It’s like the Third World is coming to America, and it’s going through Texas to get here.

Today’s Homework | Discuss

Bill Clinton weighed in on Rick "Good-Looking Rascal" Perry and the GOP's anti-government religion yesterday in NYC...


Thom Hartmann: Rick Perry is wasting no time resorting to violent rhetoric

Thom plus logo

Rick Perry is wasting no time resorting to violent rhetoric in his campaign for President. While speaking to a crowd in Iowa - Perry weighed in on the Federal Reserve - and Chairman Ben Bernanke's monetary policy saying, "If this guy prints more money between now and the election, I dunno what y'all would do to him in Iowa but we would treat him pretty ugly down in Texas." Perry went on to say, "Printing more money to play politics at this particular time in American history is almost treasonous in my opinion."

Of course - people can be put to death if convicted of treason. So here we have a guy running for President who just hinted at dragging the Federal Reserve Chairman down to Texas to be executed. Economist Nouriel Roubini tweeted about the comment saying, "The Texan thug is making murder threats on the Fed Chairman." Looks like Rick Perry is really running for America's executioner-in-chief, and he's already there as the Governor who has killed more prisoners - at least one who was innocent - than any other Governor in history.

Rick Perry apparently loves killing people as much as he loves threatening it.

-Thom

(What do you think? Tell us here.)

Monday, August 15, 2011

Randi Rhodes: Crazy Squared

Michele Bachmann won the Ames straw poll in Iowa over the weekend, gathering 29 percent of the votes. Those results could be very prophetic. I think if she runs against Barack Obama in the general election, Bachmann would get about 29 percent of the vote. Bachmann got 4,823 votes. She’s on her way! That is, if there are any other elections out there that you can win with 4,823 votes. Good luck with that. There are individuals out there who gamed the voting system on “Dancing with the Stars” and voted for Bristol Palin more times than that!

Lost in all the hoopla over Michele Bachmann coming in first in the Ames straw poll is the fact that Ron Paul also virtually came in first in the Ames straw poll. Ron Paul got 28 percent of the vote to Michele Bachmann’s 29 percent. You could take that to mean that Ron Paul is a serious candidate, but it’s more likely it indicates Michele Bachmann is not really a serious candidate. So Michele Bachmann’s big win—the win that makes her a frontrunner—was by 152 votes over a guy everyone agrees has zero chance of winning. That’s like being considered a Grammy favorite because you beat William Huang in a sing-off.

Tim Pawlenty came in a distant third, and quit the race. There is a big empty space where Tim Pawlenty used to be. Actually, it was a big empty space when Tim Pawlenty was still there. But now to fill that void we have the big void from Texas! Rick Perry announced his candidacy for president this weekend in Charleston, South Carolina—which is geographically and demographically about as far right as any place in this country. One problem though, Rick—I don’t know if Charleston, South Carolina is the best place to make your announcement after you’ve already called for your own state to secede from the Union. Really, Rick, why not go all the way and fire a symbolic cannon shot at Fort Sumter? It’s right out there in the harbor. But then Rick Perry has to talk about having Texas secede because he has no idea what it takes to make Texas succeed.

Now the GOP presidential field has a whole new landscape. And in honor of the newcomer from Texas, it’s a very arid, dry, and barren landscape.

Today’s Homework | Discuss

CNN's Fareed Zakaria had some harsh words for Obama-bashing liberals yesterday...


Thom Hartmann: Let's listen to Warren Buffett

Thom plus logo

The billionaire - and one of the richest men on the planet - had some advice for lawmakers when it comes to taxes. In an article in today's New York Times - Buffett argued for his own taxes to be raised - as well as others just like him. "While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet," Buffett wrote, "we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks." He continued, "My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress.

It's time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice." Every single poll that's come out on this issue shows that vast majority of American agree with Warren Buffett - that the rich need to pay their fair share in taxes. In fact - the only people who disagree seem to be the Republicans in Congress who've signed Grover Norquist's anti-tax pledge.

And somehow - these are the Republicans that have wormed their way into the Gang of 12 - meaning Warren Buffett's - and the American peoples' - message will likely be ignored once again.

-Thom

(Do you think they will listen to Warren Buffett? Tell us here.)

Friday, August 12, 2011

Randi Rhodes: GOP Fight Night

It's Friday, ya bastids!

Last night’s GOP debate was at least entertaining, as long as you’re convinced none of this bunch can ever really become president. Republicans would like this field of candidates to be a “Field of Dreams,” but looking at the group that gathered last night, if they had to be described using the name of a baseball movie, it would be “Eight Men Out.” OK, Michele Bachmann is not a man. And nobody is more disappointed in that than Marcus Bachmann.

Hardly anyone even tried to lay a hand on front-runner Mitt Romney. The most damaging quote against Mitt Romney from yesterday came from Mitt’s afternoon campaign appearance where he declared “Corporations are people, my friend!”

Things got a little heated last night. I had expected sparks to fly, but frankly, I thought the sparks would be from Michele Bachmann’s brain short-circuiting, not from an attack by Tim “Pit Bull” Pawlenty. Last debate, Tim Pawlenty was afraid to go after Mitt Romney. This debate he went after a girl… and lost. Tim Pawlenty attacked Michele Bachmann’s record of legislative accomplishments. Hello, Tim! Michele Bachmann is not in Congress to make laws. She’s there to make trouble. And that, she has accomplished. Tim said of Michele “It’s not her spine we’re worried about, it’s her lack of results.” To be fair, Michele Bachmann is only one of 435 members of the House. There isn’t a lot she can do as one person. And that’s the reason the United States of America is still standing. Michele Bachmann proved that she can let criticism just bounce off of her. But then Michele Bachmann can let reality just bounce off of her.

The worst moment of the night came when every single candidate raised their hands to indicate they would reject a budget with ten times more spending cuts than revenue increases. Essentially they were saying “Nobody on this stage can or will do anything to address the deficit problems.” Why stop at 10-to-1? They all would have said they’d reject a bill with a ratio of 100-to-1, or a million-to-1, or if the only tax increase was $1 to be collected on Casey Anthony alone.

Today’s Homework | Discuss


Thom Hartmann: Why not one question about the Republican plans to voucherize Medicare & turn Social Security over to Wall Street?

Thom plus logo

There was a Republican rumble in Iowa last night - as Fox so-called News hosted eight Republican candidates for their very own debate which featured not even one single question about the Republican plans to voucherize Medicare, turn Social Security over to Wall Street, and end all support to college students. The debate was filled with heated exchanges mostly about fluff - a fight between Michele Bachmann and Tim Pawlenty - and Newt Gingrich accusing the Fox News moderators of throwing "gotcha" questions at him.

It was a race to the bottom on taxes with Herman Cain pledging to cut the corporate tax rate to 25% - and then Rick Santorum immediately pledged to cut the corporate tax rate to zero. But the loudest applause of the night came when Ron Paul said we need to end our wars across the world and mind our own business with regard to Iran. To which Rick "don't Google my name" Santorum responded by saying if Iran gets a nuclear weapon - it would be the end of life as we know it.

Meanwhile - Mitt Romney played the role of the front-runner - stayed above the fray - refusing to engage anyone else on the stage - and instead focusing on Barack Obama the entire night. Although with Texas Governor Rick Perry likely jumping in the race tomorrow - Mitt may need to watch his back. Perry is a Texan - uses prayer as a policy tool - pollutes more than any other governor - and has executed more people than any other governor in modern history. Republicans may have just found their man.

-Thom

(What would you have asked? Tell us here.)

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Randi Rhodes: Hawkeye State Freak Show

Tonight eight of the Republican presidential contenders will go at it. And by “it,” I mean objective reality. A Republican debate in Iowa—you would think it would be like a warm-up for debating in the real world, but what goes on in these debates has nothing to do with the real world. What’s happening tonight is a debate taking place in a bubble, featuring a bunch of bubbleheads.

There are already a lot of questions even before the debate. One big question is whether Jon Huntsman will show up. Oh, he’s going to be there, it’s just a question of whether or not he’ll show up on the radar. Huntsman just isn’t exciting. Watching Jon Huntsman is about as exciting as watching the spray tan dry on John Boehner’s face. Will the other candidates pile on Mitt Romney? That might not be such a good idea. If you get a big pile of Republican candidates, it’s going to seem like a big steaming pile of something else. Tim Pawlenty has given indications that he’s going to show some more backbone this time. That shouldn’t be too hard. Last time Pawlenty did everything but hand his lunch money over to Mitt Romney. Tim Pawlenty was afraid to go mano-a-mano with Mitt Romney! That’s like being afraid to engage Michele Bachmann in a battle of wits! All I know is this—Michele Bachmann would definitely win… if this were a staring contest.

Sarah Palin will be in Iowa. But she won’t be at the debate. Of course not. You’re liable to be asked a question at a debate. A question like—how much longer are you going to keep up this pathetic charade of pretending to run for president? While the real candidates are debating, Sarah Palin is going to Iowa to attend the Iowa State Fair. That’s appropriate. Not as appropriate as her being at a circus, but still appropriate. This Iowa appearance is par for the course for Palin. Back when Mitt Romney launched his campaign in New Hampshire, Sarah Palin appeared in New Hampshire the same day. Sarah Palin has a knack for showing up just where she is least wanted. But then to be fair, Sarah Palin isn’t wanted anywhere. She’s is starting to seem like those insane protesters from Fred Phelps’ Westboro Baptist Church. She just shows up outside of other people’s events and gets as much attention as she can and everybody gets disgusted.

Today’s Homework | Discuss



Romney also explained to simple proles how corporations are in fact people (video).

Thom Hartmann: 79% of Americans are Dissatisfied with the U.S. Gov

Thom plus logo

A loss of faith. According to a new Washington Post poll - 79% of Americans are dissatisfied with the United States government. And only one out of four people ACTUALLY think our government can solve the nation's economic problems. It appears the 30-year effort by Republicans of dragging the good name of government through the mud by running government poorly - is working.

Expect these very same Republicans in Congress who've broken our system - to run on a campaign platform next year that government is broken. Unfortunately - what many Americans don't realize - and what most Republicans do - is that nature abhors a vacuum. And when you shrink government - something has to fill the power vacuum - and that something is ALWAYS corporate power.

Don't get rid of the government - get rid of too much corporate influence IN government.

-Thom

(Do you think the government will react? Tell us here.)

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Randi Rhodes: Silver Linings & Dark Clouds

In Wisconsin, the news is that Democrats won two of the six Republican state senate seats in the recall election. But it’s hard not to feel that the news is actually that Democrats failed to win the three they needed to take control of the senate. The loss of two seats will be a wakeup call to the Republicans. But we wanted to give them more than a wakeup call. We wanted to give them an eviction notice. Baby steps. I know—it’s hard to take baby steps when the other side is stomping on everything you hold dear. In Wisconsin, Republicans hold a monopoly on state government. And monopoly is the key word, because that Republican control turns the state of Wisconsin into a game of greed and acquisition for Republicans.

HOUR ONE GUEST: John Nichols of The Nation live from Wisconsin.

It’s important not to think that we lost this fight, especially considering that the fight isn’t over. These recall elections were on Republican turf, but a recall election of Governor Scott Walker will take place state-wide. And the results of that recall will more or less determine if the whole of Wisconsin is Republican or Democratic turf. You can’t change everything with one vote. But you can begin to change everything with one vote.

Well, the GOP selections for the big Congressional “super committee” are in. They are not exactly super. All six of the Republican picks for the Super Committee have signed Grover Norquist’s pledge never to raise any tax in any way anywhere ever. Great. That’s like putting NRA officials in charge of a disarmament conference. The Republicans chose two freshman lawmakers for the super committee, Senators Rob Portman and Pat Toomey. I can’t tell if they were chosen for their lack of experience, or their lack of willingness to negotiate. Probably a combination of both. The Democrats appointed some elder statesmen. The picks for the Republicans are neither elders, nor statesmen.

Finally, on Fox News, Andrew Napolitano claimed that President Obama went to honor the slain Navy SEALS to distract from the bad economic news. Hey, if doing that could distract people from a bad economy, wouldn’t George Bush have gone to at least one military funeral?

Today’s Homework | Discuss

MSNBC's Dylan Ratigan had his own personal 'Howard Beale moment' yesterday...


Thom Hartmann: Democracy Died First in Wisconsin - Long Live the Oligarchs

Thom plus logo

The Wisconsin recall election was the first major test of the new era in American politics. That new era began in January of 2010 when the US Supreme Court ruled in "Citizens United v. FEC" that the political voice of We The People was no longer as important as the voices of billionaires and transnational corporations.

Now we know the result, and it bodes ill for both 2012 and for the tattered future of small-d democracy in our republic. A few of America's most notorious oligarchs - including the Koch and the DeVos (Amway fortune) billionaires - as well as untraceable millions from donors who could as easily be Chinese government-run corporations as giant "American" companies who do most of their business and keep most of their profits outside the US - apparently played big in this election.

I say "apparently" because the Supreme Court has ruled that we no longer have the right to know who is really funding our election commercials, or even our candidates themselves. Thanks to an irrational and likely illegal Supreme Court ruling, we have moved into an era of oligarch-run politics. As much as $40 million of our oligarch's money was spent in Wisconsin in a handful of local races - a testing laboratory for strategies that will now be used against Democrats nationwide in 2012.

And so now we enter the battle of the oligarchs over the next fifteen or so months. As the old saying goes, when the elephants fight, the mice get trampled. In this case, the mice aren't just the voters. It's democracy itself. America is now - demonstrably, as proven by Wisconsin - just a few years away from the possibility of a totally corrupted, totally billionaire- and corporate-controlled political system. Political scientists call it oligarchy.

The Citizens United election experiment is over, and the oligarchs won. Long live the oligarchy.

-Thom

(What now? Tell us here.)

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Randi Rhodes; Badger Blowback

Today the spotlight is on the big Wisconsin recall election. And hopefully that type of bright light will get rid of the cockroaches. You have Governor Scott Walker to thank for these recall elections. Seriously, you should thank him. It’s the only thing he ever did that deserves thanks. If Scott Walker had been patient enough to slowly poison democracy like the rest of the Republican officials are doing, he wouldn’t be in this mess. But no, the poison didn’t act quickly enough for Scott Walker. He had to try and use a blunt force instrument. Walker divided the people of Wisconsin. Now we have to hope there are more people on the side of that divide that opposes Scott Walker.

HOUR TWO GUEST: John Nichols of The Nation live from Wisconsin.

You know, for a credit ratings agency, Standard & Poor's isn’t very good at credit rating. Past S&P ratings have been a terrible indicator of the likelihood of default for any particular country. If you took the opposite of S&P’s advice over the past few years, you actually would have come out ahead. So it would be wrong to say that the S&P ratings are useless. Savvy investors can still use the S&P rankings to make smart decisions—by deciding to do what they tell you not to. We need some kind of system to give ratings to credit ratings agencies. And if we want to treat them the same way they treat others, we’ll rate them very arbitrarily with faulty information.

At least the S&P downgrade highlighted the problem in Washington with Republican refusal to compromise. And then Eric Cantor came along to helpfully demonstrate the same problem. Cantor said “Over the next several months, there will be tremendous pressure on Congress to prove that (the Standard & Poor’s) analysis of the inability of the political parties to bridge our differences is wrong.” And Eric Cantor is here to prove that they are right when they point out that inability! Let nobody question Eric Cantor’s inability! Amazing—the downgrade shows the danger of small-minded, pig-headed partisan thinking, and Eric Cantor immediately declares that we can’t let the downgrade stand in the way of small-minded, pig-headed thinking. It’s like S&P said “here’s what you’re doing wrong…” and Eric Cantor responded by saying “Gotcha. We’ll certainly keep it up!” I’ll give Eric Cantor this much—he certainly can take criticism. In fact, he takes it for praise!

Today’s Homework | Discuss